The PMAC Method

How PMAC reads a project.

The method behind the read: the frameworks PMAC stands on, how a governed sequence of phases holds an analysis together, and how a project is graded against PMBOK 7 and the Kerzner maturity model. This is the engine Guy uses; the judgment is his.

01 · Foundations

The methodology foundations.

PMAC stands on two reference frameworks. PMBOK 7th Edition codifies decades of practice across thousands of program implementations - the artifacts a serious PMO produces, the dependencies between them, and the standards each must meet. Kerzner’s Project Management Maturity Model codifies the organizational practice levels that determine whether a methodology output is executable in the first place.

The pipeline treats PMBOK as the floor, the minimum bar an artifact must clear. The pipeline treats Kerzner PMMM as the signal layer, the read on whether the organization producing the artifact is ready to execute. Methodology authority remains the core competency. Everything else in this page is what we build on top.

02 · Structural

What makes a pipeline different from a one-shot generation.

Any modern AI system can produce a Charter from a brief. The output will read well. It will use PMBOK vocabulary. It may even cover the standard 13 charter sections.

A pipeline does something different.

A pipeline produces 39 artifacts that are internally consistent - the risk register and the charter reference the same assumptions, the WBS aligns with the schedule, the stakeholder register matches the communications plan, the budget contingencies reconcile with risk response strategies. A pipeline enforces this consistency through architecture. A one-shot generation enforces it through attention - and attention degrades across 39 artifacts in a long session.

A method is reviewable. Findings are meant to trace back to the evidence that supports them, so the analysis can be checked rather than trusted. A one-shot generation hands you an answer; a method hands you an answer you can audit.

A method holds its consistency by design, not by attention. Because each phase reads the prior phase’s output before it runs, the artifacts stay aligned across a long analysis, where a single-session generation drifts.

A pipeline produces executive-level synthesis - a composite grade against PMBOK Performance Domains, a Kerzner Maturity Assessment, a Critical Findings analysis, a prioritized Decisions and Actions list. Not just the artifacts, but the read of the artifacts.

A pipeline is a procurement-grade workflow. A one-shot generation is a session.

This is the difference. It is structural, not cosmetic.

For the full comparison including the system prompt we used in our own parity test, see When PMAC, When Cowork, When Both.

03 · Implementation

How the pipeline runs.

The pipeline is implemented as a sequence of methodology agents. Each agent owns a phase of the PMBOK lifecycle and reads the prior phase’s complete output before producing its own. Sequential, not parallel, because methodology is sequential. This is the technical implementation of the pipeline; the structural argument for the pipeline lives in section 02.

0

Agent 0 - Brief Assessor

Pre-flight

Reads the project brief, identifies methodology fit, surfaces ambiguities and gaps, configures the chain for the project's complexity.

Outputs

Assessment Report·Planning Artifact Evidence·Chain Configuration

1

Agent 1 - Initiating

Project Initiation

Produces the foundational governance artifacts that establish scope, stakeholders, success criteria, and risk landscape.

Outputs

Charter·Stakeholder Analysis·Requirements·Risk Register·Constraints and Assumptions·Success Criteria·Strategic Alignment·Complexity and Feasibility·Context

2

Agent 2 - Planning

Project Planning

Decomposes the work and produces the executable plan: structure, schedule, budget, resources, communications, procurement, risk response.

Outputs

WBS·Project Schedule·Budget Estimate·Risk Response·Resource Plan·Communication Plan·Procurement Plan

3

Agent 3 - Executing

Project Execution

Translates the plan into actionable execution structure: sprint setup, blocker resolution, quality checkpoints, progress reporting.

Outputs

Task Board·Sprint Acceptance·Communication (Event-Triggered)·Blocker Detection·Quality Checkpoints·Progress Report

4

Agent 4 - Monitoring and Control

Project Monitoring

Tracks performance against baseline: earned value, variance, KPIs, risk reassessment, gate decisions, change control.

Outputs

EVM Analysis·Variance Report·KPI Dashboard·Risk Reassessment·Go/No-Go Gate·Change Control

5

Agent 5 - Validating

Quality Gate

Applies the methodology rubric: PMBOK 7 Performance Domain scoring, Kerzner Maturity Assessment, critical findings, gap analysis.

Outputs

Quality Scorecard·Domain Detail·Critical Findings·Methodology Evidence

6

Agent 6 - Closing

Closeout and Knowledge Transfer

Closes out the run: project retrospective, lessons learned, closure framework, and the finalized knowledge base entry.

Outputs

Project Retrospective·Lessons Learned·Closure Report·Finalized Knowledge Base·Next-Project Readiness

7

Agent 7 - Executive Synthesis

Executive Synthesis

Synthesizes the full chain into a 5-7 page Executive Synthesis Report for sponsors and steering committees: composite grade, critical findings, risk posture, methodology assessment, and prioritized decisions.

Outputs

Executive Synthesis Report

Each agent’s output feeds the nextPMBOK 7th Edition alignedNative .docx / .pptx / .xlsx

Each handoff is schema-validated so the next agent receives structured context, not free text. The result is artifacts that are internally consistent: risks reflected in mitigations, mitigations reflected in schedule, schedule reflected in resource plan, all the way through.

04 · Output

What the pipeline produces.

Every PMAC run produces 43 artifacts total. 39 ship to you as the customer-facing output set. 4 stay on-platform as a process / output / data audit trail - what we validate every delivery against.

Chain Configuration
Process
Run-time configuration: model parameters, token usage, agent execution sequence
Co-Pilot Analysis (mid-chain)
Output
Agent 5 quality assessment of upstream agents' outputs
Finalized Knowledge Base (raw)
Data
Unfiltered cross-agent knowledge base scaffold; customer-facing KB ships through our audience-filtered variant
Co-Pilot Analysis (end-chain)
Output
Agent 6 end-of-chain quality assessment of the full sequence

Three audit dimensions - process, output, data - run on every project. This is what separates PMAC from “AI generated my project plan” tools: we ship audited output, not raw model generations.

05 · Integration

Integration with your source-of-truth systems.

You send me your project in whatever form it already lives. Documents and exports are the common case; where a source system can be read directly, that is an option, not a requirement.

  • Documents and exports. SOW, plans and schedules, status reports, meeting notes, decisions, risk logs, change documentation, spreadsheets, and exports from tools such as MS Project or Primavera P6.
  • Jira, read directly. When a project lives in Jira, PMAC can read the metadata, issues, epics, and custom fields directly, so nothing has to be re-keyed.
  • No integration project to begin. The first engagement never depends on connecting a system. We start from the materials that already exist.

06 · Rubric

PMBOK 7 Performance Domains. The exact rubric.

The pipeline’s quality gate operationalizes PMBOK’s eight Performance Domains as the rubric for evaluating every artifact produced. Each domain decomposes into observable sub-criteria. Weights derive from PMI Pulse of the Profession 2024 failure-cause analysis.

Stakeholders
16%
alignment, engagement, communication
Uncertainty
16%
risk identification, response, monitoring
Planning
16%
WBS, schedule, dependencies, estimates
Project Work
12%
resource management, knowledge transfer
Delivery
10%
scope, quality, value realization
Measurement
10%
KPIs, earned value, performance reporting
Team
10%
composition, leadership, governance
Development Approach
10%
lifecycle fit, methodology selection

Composite grade thresholds: A (90% and above), B (80 to 89.9%), C (70 to 79.9%), D (below 70%, triggers internal quality fallback).

07 · Maturity

Kerzner PMMM. Five levels. Three signals per run.

Alongside the composite grade, every run produces a maturity inference signal benchmarked against Kerzner’s five-level model. The grade tells you whether the artifact is right. The maturity signal tells you whether the organization producing it is ready to execute.

  1. Level 1Common Languagebasic PM vocabulary in use
  2. Level 2Common Processesreplicable approaches across projects
  3. Level 3Singular Methodologyintegrated organizational PM framework
  4. Level 4Benchmarkingsystematic comparison against external standards
  5. Level 5Continuous Improvementlessons learned drive sustained evolution

Each run returns three values: the level the project demands to succeed, the level the brief reveals about the organization’s actual practice, and the gap with bridging recommendations.

08 · Disclosure

Not certified. Benchmark-against. Why that matters.

PMAC is not certified by the Project Management Institute (PMI) or licensed by the International Institute for Learning (IIL). Methodology fidelity is maintained through internal audit and external peer review with practicing senior project managers. That distinction is deliberate.

Methodological honesty. Certification implies an institutional pathway PMAC does not follow. Benchmark-against is accurate.

Procurement defensibility. Enterprise buyers running formal procurement review prefer honest disclosure over claimed certification that cannot be verified.

Methodology evolution. PMBOK 7 and Kerzner PMMM are reference frameworks, not version-locked specifications. Benchmark-against allows methodology refinement without breaking certification claims.

09 · Verification

How methodology fidelity is verified.

Three mechanisms keep the rubric honest.

  • Internal canonical run audit. Identical project briefs run periodically to verify scoring stability and rubric alignment across releases.
  • Human review. Guy owns methodology fidelity: he reviews, challenges, and validates the findings before they become recommendations, and brings in peer review where an engagement warrants it.
  • Procurement-grade documentation. Every claim on this page traces to a specific reference in PMBOK 7 or Kerzner published works.

For procurement security and methodology review queries, contact guy@pmagentchain.com.

Ready to see the pipeline on a real project?

We use analytics to improve this site

We use Google Analytics and Contentsquare to understand how the website is used and improve the service. They only run if you accept. See our Privacy Policy.